
Promoting Ideas to Improve the Welfare of Animals in Experimentation
AWI offers awards of up to US$15,000 to develop and test innovative methods of refinement to the care, husbandry, or housing of animals in experimentation to improve their welfare.
2025 Dates and Deadlines
- The application cycle will open on August 11 and close on October 13 at 11:59 pm ET.
- Funding decision notifications will be sent in December.
If you would like to receive an email notification when the submission process begins each year, please send an email to [email protected]. You will be able to remove yourself from this email list at any time.
How To Apply?
Please submit a completed application form using the online submission system. You will be asked to provide a detailed study proposal, a breakdown of the proposed budget, a CV/resume, and a letter of support from the host institution. You can preview the application here.
Who Can Apply?
- This award is open to residents of the United States or Canada, and the project must be conducted in the United States or Canada.
- Animal care staff, veterinarians, students, and researchers are welcome to apply.
- Applicants can apply every year and will be equally eligible for funding even if they have received funding in previous years. Projects that were submitted but not selected for funding in previous years can be resubmitted.
- Applicants may submit more than one application per funding cycle, and AWI may consider, at its discretion, funding a second project by the same applicant if, during that cycle, funds remain after all worthy projects from other applicants have been funded. In most cases, however, AWI will fund no more than one project (through either a Refinement Research Award or an Implementing Refinement Grant) per applicant per funding cycle.
What Can Be Funded?
- Projects can be conducted in any setting (laboratory, farm, zoo, sanctuary, shelter, etc.), but the study’s conclusions must be applicable to animals used in experimentation.
- Proposals may be part of larger research projects, but the portion included in the proposal should be broadly applicable, and the research component must be completed within one year (shorter durations are encouraged).
- Projects that inflict avoidable stress or that require killing animals as part of the methodology or outcome measures will not be funded.
- It is AWI policy that no award funds can be used for indirect costs (e.g., overhead) or for the purchase of animals, unless they will be rehomed (i.e., adopted or retired to a sanctuary) at the end of the study.
- Salaries or stipends may be included in the budget proposal.
- Costs to disseminate results (e.g., conference expenses, publication fees) will not be funded.
What is the Review Process Like?
- Applications are reviewed by two independent reviewers who are not affiliated with AWI.
- Applications are anonymized by AWI staff members before they are sent to the reviewers, and reviewers score each application independently (i.e., without input from the other reviewer or from AWI staff members).
- Reviewers score applications based on the following criteria:
- Compatibility with the award’s aims, scope, and eligibility criteria
- Impact (depth, breadth, generalizability, innovation)
- Feasibility (strength and weaknesses of study design, methodology, and analysis)
- Overall merit
- Once reviewers submit their scores, AWI staff members select the highest-ranking projects for funding. The number of projects funded in any given year depends on funding availability.
If you are interested in being an independent reviewer, please contact us at [email protected]. Reviewers cannot submit project proposals for funding in the same year that they are reviewing.
Additional Information
- Award recipients must agree to submit a 500-word summary of the results of the project, including photographs (if applicable), at its conclusion. This summary may be edited for potential publication, with the recipient’s approval, in the AWI Quarterly magazine.
- Award recipients must agree to submit their results for publication in an appropriate journal or presentation at a widely attended scientific meeting.
- If IACUC or ACC approval is needed, award recipients will need to provide their approved IACUC or ACC protocol title and number before funds will be disbursed.
For additional information, please contact [email protected].
- Dr. Michael Brunt of MWB Research Consulting Services to survey public attitudes about current research practices involving insects, including live dissection.
- Dr. Samuel Olutunde Durosaro of Indiana University Indianapolis to develop species-specific protocols to safely and humanely anesthetize insects, such as cockroaches, crickets, and yellow mealworms.
- Dr. Robert Gerlai of the University of Toronto Mississauga for developing new handling methods to reduce stress and anxiety in zebrafish.
- Dr. Kristina Horback of the University of California, Davis for studying the impact of enriched housing on the learning ability, social behavior, and overall welfare of laboratory-housed sows.
- Maya Bodnar of the University of British Columbia for refining the “drop” method for induction of anesthesia in mice. RELATED PUBLICATION
- Lace Lively of Texas Biomedical Research Institute for investigating the link between compassion fatigue in laboratory animal care professionals and the social housing status of nonhuman primates at the facilities where they work (i.e., whether primates are housed singly or in pairs/groups).
- Jouvay Pantophlet of CUNY's College of Staten Island for testing the usefulness and safety of waste newspaper processed into compressed columns as burrowing substrate for naked mole-rats.
- Raymond Vagell of Texas State University for determining whether cognitive testing affects stress levels in lemurs, using a noninvasive salivary cortisol test.
- Dr. Becca Franks of New York University for investigating play behavior in fish; specifically, whether fish engage in play behavior, what circumstances elicit it (e.g., air bubbles), and how play can be used to assess welfare in this taxon.
- Alexander Greig of Texas Biomedical Research Institute for assessing the behavioral and physiological effects of implementing visual barriers in the housing of captive marmosets to reduce social stress.
- Dr. Julie Menard of the University of Calgary for testing a noninvasive alternative to sampling the intestinal microbiome in dogs. RELATED PUBLICATION
- Dr. Cathy Schuppli of the University of British Columbia for developing a positive reinforcement training program for laboratory-housed pigs and mice to improve human-animal interactions in the research setting.
- Dr. Lucía Améndola of the University of British Columbia for a systematic review of the literature to critically evaluate the effects of different environmental enrichment strategies on affective states in mice.
- Brittney Armitage-Brown of Queen’s University for testing rhesus macaque preferences for physical versus touchscreen-based tasks used as cognitive enrichment.
- Dr. Giridhar Athrey and Constance Woodman of Texas A&M University for testing the suitability of 3D printing materials for use as environmental enrichment items for laboratory birds and other species. RELATED PUBLICATION
- Dr. Christopher Cheleuitte-Nieves of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center for assessing the effects of natural, species-appropriate, visual environments on stress and behavior of indoor-housed macaques and African green monkeys.
- Margaret Dye of the Duke Lemur Center for building and assessing an enrichment management tracking system for documenting and monitoring multiple enrichment activities that impact an animal’s environment and welfare.
- Sasha Prasad-Shreckengast of CUNY Hunter College for a project assessing voluntary interaction of carp with novel environmental enrichment items that promote cognitive stimulation and agency. RELATED PUBLICATION
- Dr. Lucía Améndola of the University of British Columbia for assessing the welfare benefits of using playpens for research mice. RELATED PUBLICATION
- Dr. Rachel Dennis of the University of Maryland for assessing the effectiveness of specific environmental enrichments on laboratory quail welfare.
- Dr. Brianna Gaskill of Purdue University for analyzing social networks of group-housed male laboratory mice to identify effective interventions for aggression. RELATED PUBLICATION
- Dr. Nicole Herndon of the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign for assessing best practices for helping research dogs retire to forever homes.
- Rachel van Vliet of McGill University for investigating the use of species-specific behavior by animal care staff as a source of enrichment for macaques and marmosets in laboratories. RELATED PUBLICATION
- Dr. Kathleen Coda of the University of Illinois at Chicago for developing and validating environmental enrichment strategies to improve the welfare of rabbits housed in standard-size laboratory cages. RELATED PUBLICATION
- Dr. Brianna Gaskill of Purdue University for investigating the link between laboratory personnel’s professional quality of life and the provision of environmental enrichment to animals under their care. RELATED PUBLICATION