Protection of Sea Turtles

Protection of Sea Turtles
Case Name: 
Animal Welfare Institute, et al. v. BP America, Inc., et al.
Nature of Case: 

The Animal Welfare Institute and its co-plaintiffs brought claims pursuant to the Endangered Species Act and other laws against BP for burning critically endangered sea turtles as part of its clean-up efforts in the Gulf of Mexico following the massive Deepwater Horizon oil spill. The animal welfare and conservation groups subsequently amended their complaint to include the U.S. Coast Guard as a defendant for directing BP’s containment activities.

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
Year Filed: 
The Animal Welfare Institute; Center for Biological Diversity; Turtle Island and Restoration Network; Animal Legal Defense Fund
BP America, Inc.; BP Exploration and Production; British Petroleum PLC; Admiral Robert J, Papp, Jr.; Admiral Thad Allen

On July 2, 2010, the parties reached an interim agreement stipulating that BP and the U.S. Coast Guard would institute standard protocols for sea turtle observation and rescue in the Gulf of Mexico in order to minimize any adverse impacts of containment activities on sea turtles. The following day, an emergency meeting was held with representatives of the parties and scientists to discuss the methods being employed by the U.S. Coast Guard and how such methods could be altered to enhance the protection of sea turtles. On July 4, 2010, the U.S. Coast Guard released its Best Management Practices for sea turtles and marine mammals related to in-situ burning operations for the Deepwater Horizon response.

Find out more about the background of the case, check out case media, view our additional resources related to this case, or learn more about issues facing marine life.