|
Makah Tribe Whaling Chronology
1855
– The United States Government (USG) and Makah Tribe entered into the Treaty of
Neah Bay which secured “[t]he right of taking fish and of whaling or sealing at
usual and accustomed grounds and stations…in common with all citizens of the
United States.”
Late 1920s
– The Makah Tribe ceased whaling after the population of eastern North Pacific (ENP)
gray whales significantly declined, due largely to commercial whaling. After the
Tribe stopped whaling, its subsistence need for whale meat disappeared.[1]
1946
– USG signed the ICRW and joined the IWC. In 1949 it enacted the Whaling
Convention Act (WCA) implementing the ICRW and making it unlawful to whale in
violation of the ICRW, the IWC Schedule, or a United States Secretary of
Commerce.
1970
– Gray whales were listed as “endangered” under the United States Endangered
Species Conservation Act, a precursor to the 1973 Endangered Species Act (ESA).
In 1972 the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA) was enacted prohibiting the
unpermitted taking of marine mammals except by “Alaskan Natives…for subsistence,
or [f]or purposes of creating and selling authentic native articles of
handicraft and clothing…to an Indian, Aleut or Eskimo.”
1994
– USG removed ENP gray whales from the ESA listing and began a five-year
monitoring program.
1995
– The Makah Tribe notified the USG of its interest in resuming the hunting of
ENP gray whales for a “ceremonial and subsistence harvest”[2]
and asked the USG to seek IWC approval for a quota.
1997
– After submitting and then withdrawing a proposal for a quota of ENP gray
whales at the 1996 IWC meeting, the USG submitted a joint proposal with the
Russian Federation for 620 ENP gray whales, of which 20 were for the Makah
Tribe. The proposal was approved by IWC consensus after the insertion into the
ICRW Schedule of the term “whose traditional subsistence and cultural needs have
been recognized.”
1997
– A lawsuit was filed against the USG challenging the adequacy of the USG’s
compliance with domestic law, namely the National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) which requires adequate and transparent analysis of federal actions with
significant environment impact.[3]
1998
– With litigation ongoing, NMFS allocated the quota to the Makah Tribe the 1999
season under the WCA. In the same year, summary judgment was made in favor of
the USG. The decision was appealed.
1999
– A single ENP gray whale was struck and landed. Later that year the USG ended
its 5-year monitoring program of the ENP gray whales and concluded that the
population should remain de-listed from the ESA.
2000
– An appeal against the lawsuit judgment was successful and prevented the Makah
Tribe from whaling legally until the USG complied with the law. The USG
recommenced its domestic legal obligations and completed its NEPA
responsibilities in 2001. A further lawsuit was filed in 2002 challenging the
adequacy of the NEPA compliance and citing a violation of the MMPA.[4]
2002
– With litigation ongoing, the USG submitted a successful joint proposal with
the Russian Federation to the IWC for an aboriginal subsistence quota of 620 ENP
gray whales, of which 20 were for the Makah Tribe for the period 2003 through
2007.
2002
– After initial summary judgment in favor of the USG, the decision was
overturned on appeal. The USG was forced to recommence its NEPA obligations and
require that the Makah Tribe seek a waiver to the MMPA to hunt whales. Illegal
whaling by members of the Makah Tribe was stopped.
2004
– The IWC adopted by consensus a USG co-sponsored proposal to strike the
language relating to the IWC having to recognize the “traditional aboriginal
subsistence and cultural needs” of aboriginal subsistence whalers of ENP gray
whales, that had been inserted prior to the approval of the 1997 Russian-US ENP
gray whale quota request.[5]
2005
– Members of the Makah Tribe requested a waiver to the MMPA. The USG commenced
its domestic legal obligations under NEPA and the MMPA. The process is ongoing
and may take at least a year to conclude, assuming the documentation is in order
and depending on any legal challenges to the final decision.
2007
– The USG submitted a joint proposal with the Russian Federation to the IWC for
620 ENP gray whales, of which 20 would be for the Makah Tribe.[6]
The proposal was approved by IWC consensus though again the subsistence nature
of the hunt was questioned.
2007
– Five members of the Makah Tribe, including members of the Makah Whaling
Crew and the Crew Captain hunt and kill a gray whale in the Strait of San Juan
de Fuca.
The 2007 Needs Statement submitted by the
United States at IWC59 (IWC/59/ASW9) states the “subsistence benefits [were]
reintroduced to the Makah community ...in 1999.”
“Chronology of Major Events Related to Makah
Tribal Whale Hunt,” NMFS Northwest Regional Office.
Metcalf v. Daley, 214 F.3d 1135 (9th Cir. 2000)
on appeal.
Anderson v. Evans, 371 F.3d 475, 500 (9th Cir.
2004) on appeal, after two refusals by the court to allow defendants requests
for en banc review.
Annual Report of the International Whaling
Commission, Sorrento, Italy. 2004.
Chair’s
Summary Report of the 59th Annual Meeting, Anchorage, Alaska, May 2007
|